I am all about diversity.
Disagreement and Diversity vs. hate speech
It’s important to recognize the difference between encouraging diversity in the public discourse while rejecting hate speech. I take great pride in the fact that my online friends are quite diverse, coming from multiple religious and ethnic backgrounds, many of which have little to nothing to do with New Orleans. There are numerous topics we can discuss that show this diversity:
- Which is better, Star Trek or Star Wars?
- Should you read the book before or after seeing the movie?
- The extent to which historic preservation should be carried
- Antoine’s or Galatoires?
- Government supervision of public education: federal, state, or local level?
- Starbuck or Number Six?
- Are leggings acceptable as pants?
- Priorities for government spending
- Wine Pairings
- The role of the US Military in fighting terrorism
All these and so many more are subjects that generate a wide and diverse range of opinions, making for wonderful discussions.
- There are some subjects, however, that just don’t make the list:
- Basing public policy on religious faith rather than scientific fact
- The virtue of interring people whose ethnic background is different from the majority
- Inciting violence in political discourse
- Threatening people because they disagree with you
- Demanding everyone adhere to your religious beliefs
There was a time when the two political parties in the United States reflected the diversity of the country. In the last thirty-five years, however, the parties have split to the point where it’s a challenge to have a discussion about partisan politics without the participants shouting past each other. The biggest problem in this election cycle is the disconnect between people who identify as “conservative” and the incredibly hateful rhetoric their candidates put forth. Look at the current top four in the Republican field:
- Trump wants to lock up Muslims like we did the Japanese in WWII, while barring entry to the US to Muslims from other countries.
- Carson doesn’t think Muslims should be allowed to hold public office
- Rubio wants to class LGBT citizens as being in a lower class than straight citizens
- Cruz openly advocates Christian Theocracy as a form of government for the US
It’s one thing to say you support many of the traditional conservative positions that are part of the public discourse. It’s another to espouse one religion over others, advocate discrimination, and espouse outright hatred that incites violence. We’ve come to that point in our national political debate where one of the two political parties does these things. When you vote for Republicans at the state and local level, it enables the horrible things we see at the national level. That’s a discussion we can have as rational human beings.
Those who openly support internment of people for their religion, those who demand we all follow the specific tenets of their religious faith, and those who are OK with violence to further their political goals are unacceptable to me. Those who enable these various types of hate are unacceptable to me. If you show me that you hate, or enable hate, I’m done. That includes saying you “Like” Donald Trump on Facebook.